marshallsmyth said:
I am told we actually have 11 kinds of Oak around here. . .
I wonder where the "Oregon Oak" fits into that group.
You know how on the mentoring thread folks were talking about learning? I was curious about the name of Bob's "Valley Oak" and checked on Wikipedia. It isn't the one that ranges from just north of San Francisco all the way into Washington State. That seems to be the Oregon Oak, Quercus garryana. It is also called the Garry oak. "The tree is named after Nicholas Garry, deputy governor of the Hudson's Bay Company, 1822-35."
Wait a minute, I know someone named for a governor of the HBC named Garry: Spokane Garry. It is possible that
no one else has an interest in this but I did a few minutes of checking and, yep, the same Hudson's Bay guy.
Spokane Garry was the son of the Indian whose name now graces the city and river in eastern Washington. Spokane's son was taken to central Canada for education. One of 3 Indian boys, he is the only one who survived the experience.
Spokane Garry also survived for 80-some years and never came to agreement with the US government regarding a reservation for his people. He stayed right beside what became a fairly good-sized city during the last few years of the 19th century. He saw it all, from the arrival of the 1st fur traders to urban America.
Not all that different from elsewhere, the reservation was imposed on the Spokanes. It was created by President Rutherford B. Hayes, by executive order - not negotiated, as I understand it. Spokane Garry said that the tribe could not live on such a small piece of ground. Other Spokanes agreed with him and many of them went off to the Couer d'Alene reservation.
I wonder what Spokane Garry thought of using a white man's name. He probably felt that it could be used against the Americans since it connected him with the British & Canadians. His life may have been long but he was never successful in increasing the Spokanes' territory and died in a teepee in a canyon west of the city.
The name thing also exists with "the Colville" which isn't really a tribe but a reservation. At least 2 different native people were assigned to life there. They have very different languages so, one must assume, didn't consider themselves all that close ethnically. And Colville? Another Hudson Bay Company governor. He was the son of a Jamaican sugar cane plantation owner, aka a major slave holder. How the native people on the Colville reservation think of that, I don't know. Probably just another troubling part of their history.
Steve