NwMtGardener
Garden Addicted
Chickie, i can see your point here, something does need to be done about the reimbursements. However, if you base it on "success rate" people in poor health wont be able to find anyone to do a procedure on them. Let's face it, not everyone is in the same state of health when they go in for a procedure. Like Jared said, some people just dont take care of themselves. And it's rarely clearcut when there is an adverse outcome to a procedure. Was it the patients poor health to begin with? Did the scrub tech not use sterile procedure? Did the patient not follow aftercare instructions? Occassionally there is clearcut negligence that could be blamed on a doctor, but its much more rare than all the other things that could go wrong. Like, is it a doctor's fault that there are so many mutated infections from overuse of antibiotics these days?? Its a super complicated subject!!Chickie'sMomaInNH said:i was thinking that the rate of reimbursement for these hospitals should be on a scale based on their success rate of procedures they perform. if they do good at certain procedures they get a higher reimbursement. a poor success rate, i.e. patient dies, gets serious infection, or for some reason drs. have to go back in to fix something they missed, there is a lower reimbursement.
!'