Rosalind
Deeply Rooted
Yeah, Gourmet, Bon Appetit and one other (I forget the name) were all owned by one parent publisher that owns a lot of magazines, Conde Nast. They dumped Gourmet and a couple of their bridal magazines.
There's still Cook's Illustrated, which is really my favorite. Gourmet recipes were OK but every once in a while you'd get a clunker, usually when it came to side dishes. Their side dishes tended to be really side dishes only, not great enough to eat on their own. Cook's Illustrated is more consistent, every single recipe in there is stupid-proofed and so yummy that it can be eaten as a main course.
Both are better than Martha S. though. Her cakes are good, and her big meat roasts are fabulous, but that's about all she is really good at. Everything else she cooks is merely edible, not excellent. If I wanted merely edible, I have my trusty 1960s era Joy Of Cooking and Better Homes, replete with jello mold fruit salads and cream-of-something soup in every recipe.
There's still Cook's Illustrated, which is really my favorite. Gourmet recipes were OK but every once in a while you'd get a clunker, usually when it came to side dishes. Their side dishes tended to be really side dishes only, not great enough to eat on their own. Cook's Illustrated is more consistent, every single recipe in there is stupid-proofed and so yummy that it can be eaten as a main course.
Both are better than Martha S. though. Her cakes are good, and her big meat roasts are fabulous, but that's about all she is really good at. Everything else she cooks is merely edible, not excellent. If I wanted merely edible, I have my trusty 1960s era Joy Of Cooking and Better Homes, replete with jello mold fruit salads and cream-of-something soup in every recipe.