- Thread starter
- #11
OldGuy43
Garden Ornament
thistlebloom said:I personally never wanted anything from the government to assist me, I'm not eager for those strings.
thistlebloom said:I personally never wanted anything from the government to assist me, I'm not eager for those strings.
OldGuy43 said:Actually, what I'm thinking of is the days of everyone who wanted their kids to get an education got together, built a school house and the school master was fed at different families homes on a rotating basis as part of his pay. Talk about direct control of cost versus result that was it.
I remember being told by one fellow how much of a better education he'd gotten because he'd went to a parochial school. Of course I just had to point out to him that we were both standing in the same ditch with a shovel in our hands.
I've heard this theory before. Do you really think that because I rent I don't indirectly pay property taxes? Do you really think the landlord doesn't take the tax burden into consideration when he sets the rent.seedcorn said:Interesting subject.
Schools are bankrolled by property owners. We have no choice except to not own property.
No, I don't, but the basic model would work, and it would eliminate all the administrative overhead that we have today, not to mention the costly facilities that have nothing to do with education.catjac1975 said:Is that how you think modern educators should live?
Therein lies the basic problem. We under the mistaken impression that education has to be expensive to be good.catjac1975 said:Do you think only people of means should have educated children?