Pulsegleaner
Garden Master
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 3,567
- Reaction score
- 7,052
- Points
- 306
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, New York
I think a good microcosm of this is what the CIA did in the 1950's with Haiti and its pigs. They rounded up the small native black pigs that the Haitians had been using for generations and slaughtered them all under the auspices of controlling an outbreak of disease (I think it was the swine flu that had evolved from the Spanish Flu virus). In compensation, they gave the Haitian farmer brand new top bred American white pigs. It wasn't until later that the farmers realized the new pigs would only eat special high end very expensive feed (as opposed to the old ones, who would happily live on scraps and garbage) and needed special housing (while the old ones could run around free just fine). The economy collapsed, and most farmers wound up selling their land and moving to the cities...….just like the CIA had planned all along, since they had started this at the behest of American Big Ag, who wanted Haiti to switch from subsistence farming to growing fruit for national export (on plantations they now owned.)Reading this was quite chilling because you outline a perfect auspice under which saving seeds could conceivably be 'legally' forbidden. I had thought a little here and there about it, how they might go about justifying that kind of 'mandate' and pacify the resistant. It would be done for 'the greater good' to protect such and such, fill in the blank. Not likely they could pull it off in the name of a separate corporate interest, but to claim it is in the best interest of 'the food supply' for all - say in the case of nationalising food production due to independent commercial shortages/issues. Plausibly they could claim independent seed savers/planters endanger their carefully managed lines, lines they will 'need to protect' to feed the population. Even now, OP seeds are often considered (wrongly I think) to be vectors of disease. Scary, like the worst sci-fi. Though realistically, some of this is already underway and has been for some time.
But what I was talking about was going the extra mile to take EVERYTHING, and make dealing with them mandatory. Big Ag is a system and every person who saves seeds or grows public domain ones is opting out of that system. And those who run such systems never like that. There is no marked more profitable than a perfectly inelastic one (one where demand stays constant regardless of the price), and there is no way better of getting people to buy into such a market than making it that they don't have a choice. If we let them, they will soon own all the rights to our food, our timber, and if we really let them go all the way, our oxygen (if they really DID manage to wipe out all wild vegetation down to the algae in the seas, then the plants THEY own would be the only source of oxygen on the planet and they would effectively own our air.)