flowerbug
Garden Master
Now wait a minute, Flowerbug. As the drought continued, the feds charged more and more for water for the farmers, the Fed operated reservoirs were dropping in acre feet every day, and the farmers finally has to lay fallow to 1000's of acres of farmland. Some farms went belly up over time. Day laborers were laid off. Towns lost revenue. Land has sunk in inches. Aquifers have shrunk. Wells have gone dry. I know. I lived there.
The Hetch Hetchy and the other humongous reservoirs were drying up and we humans in many urban areas were put on a plan to conserve water. All of my shower water went into Lowes buckets and was tossed into the yard for foundation plants. We had a tiny patch of grass. We had to conserve and conserve. Lack of water is one of the reasons I and my Native California Husband left our state.
Then in 2016, the rains and snow came. We had snow melt, which is where the majority of the water comes from for the West. Snow melt. The reservoirs filled up. Conservation was no longer mandated, but the majority of humans continued to conserve as they had learned to.
Then the 2017 and 2018 winter...no snow little rain. Farmers were put on allotment. Humans were not. Farmers couldn't afford to buy the water from the Feds. Alternative irrigation methods were invested in, but not all farmers have the deep pockets to "try" something new. Micro drips for trees; underground irrigation for row crops; drones for farm monitoring; etc.
This situation that the drought put the West in was preceded by decades and decades of mismanagement and politics of our Federal Govt. Greedy people wanting water for growing communities, not for farmland.
I don't know how the West can continue to be the Fresh Veggie Salad Capital for the US if water isn't released on a greater scale and less costly method than it is now.
unfortunately the statistics don't show what you write above... the cities did cut back their use of water, but the farms didn't cut back in a similar amount. these are facts from the actual agencies involved.
the other fact is the shrinking ground as you note. you don't have that happening if you're not overpumping ground water...
i was glad to hear that the whole population of California finally said that "enough is enough." and passed the ground water legislation that they did. but they made it far enough into the future that it won't be helping many for quiet a long time. in the mean-time you can see the farming lobby trying to scrape up every way they can to turn those rules around to take even more water from the rivers, etc. all in the while crying about the damage the "environmentalists" are doing to their lives, but you'd not ever catch them saying they perhaps are responsible for what they're doing (which they are) or the conditions they find themselves in.
if i had a shallow well that served my use for 20 or more yrs and then someone came in next door and pumped so much groundwater that the well no longer worked wouldn't you think that is just basically wrong? that the well owner who was living within their means suddenly has to pay thousands of $ to get water back and then it is likely the over pumper next door has much more $ to dig a much deeper bigger well that the personal small house owner can't ever keep up until it's all gone for everyone. the extractor has the use of more $ because they are abusing their environment, but they've never had to compensate the people they've ruined in the process nor have they had to restore the rivers they've stopped from flowing (due to the lack of groundwater that used to be available that is now gone)...
if you look around you find that people are fighting for the wild rivers and returning the fish populations and having functional rivers again, but it's a long hard fight. i wish them all luck and support every one of them.
i also support farmers who live within their means and aren't so greedy that they won't help out the surrounding environment. the ones that aren't deserve to be put out of business ASAP.