...
Massacre Lake ~ was named in the memory of a pioneer party killed by Indians. The massacre got little attention as Papers in the East where romanticized bad treatment of Indians by Federal Government and settlers in the wild west were popular. The men and boys were killed and chopped up, women taken as slaves and the well stocked wagons looted. Another story is that the families in the eastern U.S. never had friends and relatives leave and travel west with a large number of wagons, animals and material to start a new life in the west. Talking of Indian attack is frowned upon today in favor of inhumane government treatment of indigenous people.
http://www.onlinenevada.org/sites/default/files/Massacre_Layton_1977.pdf
Yes, that is the paper I was reading yesterday. As I say, I knew nothing about the origin of the name until then, despite being in that area a couple of times. I doubt that a garden forum is all that appropriate for these discussions but, here goes:
That paper says nothing of what you stated although I'm unsure what all you mean, the sentences seem a bit conflicted. Compare the words of the author of the paper, Thomas Layton, PhD, Harvard, and director of the Nevada State Museum. Dr Layton had been doing archeological research in the area for 11 years before publishing the paper.
Citing "Papers Transmitted by the Secretary of the Oregon Territory to the US Congress," Layton says, "That the Massacre of 1850 was not recorded in the 1850s when it would have been sensational news poses a serious question concerning its historical authenticity. Systematic compilation of all known records of murders of Caucasians by Indians in Oregon and northern California was begun in 1854, only four years after the alleged massacre, by order of the Secretary of the Oregon Territory." The papers were submitted to Congress in 1859.
Layton goes on to conclude, "The deception of the cache-making Forty-niner may not have fooled his contemporaries but the deception was not without some small success. It fooled generations of cowboys and historians, and provided Nevada with a series of colorful place-names which dramatize the history of the High Rock Country, even if they do not contribute to its accuracy."
I'm sure that I don't know but if you have anything after the late 1970's that you can cite that argues otherwise, I'd be willing to read it. As I say however, it all hardly fits in a garden forum discussion.
Steve