thistlebloom
Garden Master
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 16,473
- Reaction score
- 17,411
- Points
- 457
- Location
- North Idaho 48th parallel
I'm not a potatoologist, and I would never argue with Steve or agronomists, however..... (had to get those disclaimers out of the way )...that was not my experience. I never cut my seed, and this year as an experiment and just for grins, I planted one of those HUGE russet bakers from Costco, whole. I harvested -hang on- I'll run out to the garage and count..... 17 spuds from it. None were as gigantic as the mother, but they were all respectable, and no marbles. Nearly all of the potatoes in that northeast bed were wonderfully productive and large. It was such fun digging them! I kept running back to the house to show off the big guys.digitS' said:Spacing and number of eyes on your cut seed is important.
Some folks don't think so and say that one eye can produce multiple plants anyway. But, it isn't what the agronomists advise for the spud farmers - limit what will grow in the square foot by limiting the number of eyes at planting.
Planting a whole seed potato is likely to result in many "small potatoes." Actually, it is a way for growers of fingerlings to limit the size and they may crowd them deliberately by not cutting the seed &/or close planting.
Steve
By contrast, the ones I planted in the southwest bed, ( and there were a few of the same varieties as the NW bed ) were smaller and less productive and had many marbles, although there were a few great big ones. That bed is still pretty new and very rocky and I have a lot of work ahead of me to build up the humus and fertility, and because I planted it after the NW bed I started planting closer than I wanted. So in that bed I guess the "whole seed = smaller potatoes" held true to an extent. But the other bed planted the same way was just amazing.