Jared77
Garden Addicted
Those people who choose to eat the sugar, artificial sweeteners, dye, artificial flavors, preservatives, and overly processed products of things grown with chemicals that pass for 'food' today may be saving money on a weekly basis, but how many of them instead pay--or will pay in the end--the pharmaceutical companies and doctors to treat their cancer, diabetes, heart problems, obesity?
Has current farming practices been proven to show a direct correlation to these conditions?
How much of it is lifestyle? How much of these things are due to a lack of portion control? A sedentary lifestyle? Unhealthy cooking techniques?
It seems to me that most people who are cautious of what they eat tend to be more active in general. Even if it's simple stuff like working in the garden and fencing to their animals. Let alone going to the gym or making a conscious effort to exercise.
Are there any studies between a healthy diet and quality of health vs the same diet but with only organic versions to compare? That way the variable is the organic component.
I have a hard time believing that if I had layers and collected an egg from a free range layer that's fed a commercial diet it would be less nutritious than a free range layer that is fed an organic diet.